• Intro Text: The State of California is now considering a bill to create a statewide single-payer health care system. This study by Robert Pollin, James Heintz, Peter Arno and Jeannette Wicks-Lim provides an economic analysis of the proposed measure, The Healthy California Act (SB-562). The study finds that the proposed single-payer system could provide decent health care for all California residents while still reducing net overall health care costs by about 8 percent relative to the existing system. The single-payer system will generate financial benefits for both families and businesses at all levels of the California economy.  For families at most income levels and for businesses of most sizes, these financial benefits will be substantial.>> See press coverage   >> Watch interview with Robert Pollin
  • Type of publication: Research Report
  • Research or In The Media: Research
  • Research Area: Health Policy
  • Publication Date: 2017-05-30
  • View pdf
  • Authors:
    • Add Authors: Robert Pollin
    • Add Authors: James Heintz
    • Add Authors: Peter Arno
    • Add Authors: Jeannette Wicks-Lim
  • Show in Front Page Modules: Yes
Economic Analysis of the Healthy California Single-Payer Health Care Proposal (SB-562)

>> View press conference

>> Read press coverage

Abstract:

The State of California is considering a bill to create a statewide single-payer health care system. This study provides an economic analysis of the proposed measure, The Healthy California Act (SB-562). The study includes four major sections: 1) Cost Estimate of Universal Health Care Coverage in California; 2) Cost Saving Potential under Healthy California; 3) Financing Healthy California; and 4) Impact on Individual California Families and Businesses. The primary goal of Healthy California is to provide high-quality health care to all California residents, including those who are presently either uninsured or underinsured. The study finds that the providing full universal coverage would increase overall system costs by about 10 percent, but that the single payer system could produce savings of about 18 percent. The study thus finds that the proposed single-payer system could provide decent health care for all California residents while still reducing net overall costs by about 8 percent relative to the existing system. We propose two new taxes to generate the revenue required to offset the loss of private insurance spending: a gross receipts tax of 2.3 percent and a sales tax of 2.3 percent, along with exemptions and tax credits for small business owners and low-income families to promote tax-burden equity. Within this proposed tax framework, Healthy California can achieve both lower costs and greater equity in the provision of health care in California for both families and businesses of all sizes. Thus, net health care spending for middle-income families will fall by between 2.6 – 9.1 percent of income. Small firms that have been providing private health care coverage for their workers will experience a 22 percent decline in their health-care costs as a share of payroll. The small firms that have not provided coverage will still make zero payments for health care under Healthy California through their gross receipts tax exemption. Medium-sized firms will see their health care costs fall by between 6.8 and 13.4 percent as a share of payroll relative to the existing system. Firms with up to 500 employees will experience a 5.7 percent fall, and the largest firms, with over 500 employees, will experience a 0.6 percent fall as a share of payroll relative to the existing system.

>> Link to Extended Technical Appendix 4 4

umass logo

This is an official web page
of the University of Massachusetts.

Political Economy Research Institute

Gordon Hall, 418 N. Pleasant St., Suite A

Amherst, MA 01002
Tel: 413-545-6355 Fax: 413-577-0261
Contact: